The Politics of Vaccine Donation and Diplomacy
Trade

The Politics of Vaccine Donation and Diplomacy

Is a friend in need a friend indeed?

Employees unload the AstraZeneca (SKBio Corea) vaccines under the COVAX scheme against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from a cargo plane at the Mons. Oscar Arnulfo Romero International Airport, in San Luis Talpa, El Salvador March 11, 2021.
Employees unload AstraZeneca vaccines, under the COVAX scheme, from a cargo plane at the Mons. Oscar Arnulfo Romero International Airport in El Salvador on March 11, 2021. REUTERS/Jose Cabezas

Five months into the largest vaccination campaign in world history, global rollout has been marked by deep inequity. Nine countries are responsible for three-quarters of all doses administered worldwide, whereas 54 nations have yet to administer a single shot.

One way to bridge this gap between the vaccine-haves and vaccine-have-nots would be for countries with early access to doses to donate some of their supplies to other nations without sufficient access, particularly those struggling with surging cases. Think Global Health is tracking to what extent such transfers have occurred.

Based on government websites, official statements, and media reports, as of April 8, Think Global Health has identified 19 countries that have donated a total of 27.5 million doses to 102 nations. The first half of this article will explore the nature of these donations, and the second will explain how vaccine diplomacy—the use or delivery of vaccines to advance political goals—is motivating four vaccine donors: China, India, Israel, and Russia.

A full database with sources is included below. This tracker will be updated regularly.

Workers offload boxes of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines as the country receives its coronavirus disease vaccines under COVAX at the Phnom Penh International Airport, Cambodia, March 2, 2021.
Workers offload boxes of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines as the country receives its coronavirus disease vaccines under COVAX at the Phnom Penh International Airport, Cambodia, March 2, 2021. REUTERS/Cindy Liu

The Donors

The United States, European Union, the United Kingdom, and a few other wealthy democracies are typically at the forefront of global health, providing the most development assistance for health. To be clear, these traditional aid leaders have not disappeared in the COVID-19 pandemic; they have offered bilateral financial and procurement assistance and substantial funding for multilateral initiatives like the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access program, COVAX. But, they have taken a backseat when it comes to directly donating COVID-19 vaccines. The European Union has refused to share doses until it has "a better production situation," and the United States' provision of vaccines to Mexico and Canada is a loan that must be repaid with doses if and when the United States should need them.

To fill this void, emerging donors, such as China and India, and even traditional recipients of aid, like Senegal and Serbia, have stepped in. While these donors have not matched COVAX in total doses provided, they have offered vaccines to more countries. And four vaccine donors, China, India, Israel, and Russia, have taken a similarly global approach to vaccine donation.

The Donations

To date, most vaccine donations have been small—170,000 doses or fewer—and because all gifted vaccines require a two-dose regimen, the average donation is enough to fully protect just 85,000 people. But averages do not capture the disparities between donations. With few exceptions, donor countries have not distributed vaccines according to the population size or the severity of the coronavirus crisis in recipient nations. While the multilateral initiative COVAX, is allocating vaccines in amounts proportionate to the population size of the recipient nation, vaccine donors are not. Many small nations, particularly in the Caribbean and Indian Ocean, have received enough doses to vaccinate more than 10 percent of their population; in contrast, more populous recipient countries have received enough to fully protect no more than 1 percent of their populations.

Nor are countries receiving vaccines in proportion to their current burden of COVID-19. While the true number of infections is undoubtedly much higher than recorded in many nations, especially in regions and countries where testing rates are low, the majority of recipient countries are getting donations in excess of their recent case numbers. For example, Myanmar, Nepal, Cambodia, and Afghanistan all received donations ranging from 0.9 to 2 million doses despite reporting relatively few COVID-19 cases. At the extreme, the Lao People's Democratic Republic has received 44,000 doses for every reported in that country since November 2020.

When looking at regional allocation of vaccine doses, distribution is even more inequitable. Countries in East and South Asia have received 57.97 percent of all pledged donations, despite having just 9.23 percent of confirmed cases since November 2020. In contrast, Latin America and Eastern Europe, which have weathered recent surges in cases and have struggled to secure vaccine access outside of COVAX, are receiving far fewer donated doses than necessary to keep pace with their current outbreaks. Colombia, South Africa, and Ukraine, for instance, have accounted for 4.23 percent of all global cases since November, but administered just 0.44 percent of all vaccine doses. None have received a single donation.

If donors are not distributing COVID-19 vaccines on the basis of need or equity, what is driving donations? China, India, Israel, and Russia, the four countries that have taken a global approach to vaccine diplomacy—i.e., providing vaccines to at least ten countries on three continents or more—have largely done so in alignment with their national and strategic interests.

Of the 56 countries to which China has pledged doses, all but one are participants in its Belt and Road Initiative, an ambitious global infrastructure project that aims to increase Chinese influence, develop new investment opportunities, and strengthen economic and trade cooperation across 139 countries.

The link between the Belt and Road Initiative and donations should not come as a surprise. China has promoted global health governance, disease surveillance, and international health cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative's "Health Silk Road" since 2015. It also sent masks, medical aid, and expertise to Belt and Road participants earlier in the pandemic. Now, China is using vaccine donations to further elevate the Belt and Road Initiative in bilateral relations. Preceding or immediately following many donation announcements, Chinese ambassadors and high-ranking officials including President Xi Jinping have met with counterparts in recipient countries to discuss deepening or expanding bilateral cooperation. More explicitly, Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi has stated that the Belt and Road is "a corridor for life-saving supplies." Latin American and Caribbean nations, which were slow to join the Belt and Road Initiative, have received few vaccine donations from China.

Another potential motivation for Chinese donations is ensuring or incentivizing support for Beijing's positions on Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang. In the Caribbean, after Guyana and Dominica accepted donations they reaffirmed their commitments to the "One China Policy." Meanwhile, several Muslim-majority countries, such as Egypt and Kyrgyzstan, offered support to China's positions on Xinjiang and then received vaccine donations.

India, the world's largest vaccine producer, has rivaled China in the scale of its donation efforts, with President Narendra Modi pitching its Vaccine Maitri ("vaccine friendship") as a tool to "help all humanity in fighting this crisis." India's Minister of External Affairs even pledged that India will be "the pharmacy of the world" and thus help all nations overcome this pandemic. However, India's largesse is not benefiting all countries equally. Three-quarters of their donations, or 8.2 million doses, have gone to just ten countries in East and South Asia. Everywhere else, Indian donations are averaging 70,000 doses per country. Traditionally, India's aid resources have been limited, and so the country targeted bilateral assistance to a few South and Southeast Asian countries. But since the 2000s, India has evolved into a more far-reaching donor, increasing resources and coordination for assistance. Though India has bolstered relations with and aid to other regions, particularly Africa, President Modi's "neighborhood first" approach to foreign policy has further intensified the focus on South and Southeast Asia in order to counter China's growing influence. Beyond South and Southeast Asia, New Delhi aims to target countries where it can compete with Beijing for influence, focusing non-Asian vaccine donations on countries in Africa and the Caribbean, particularly where there is a sizable Indian diaspora or shared association through the Commonwealth.

Though Russia has pitched its vaccines as the best in the world and gone to great lengths to promote them overseas, it has not made donations a cornerstone of its vaccine diplomacy. Limited by production and economic capacity, Moscow has generally opted for bilateral purchase and licensing agreements, saying that it preferred bilateral deals over COVAX, and offering small donations to only a few nations.

The majority of Russian donations have been in quantities smaller than 20,000 doses (and as small as 20). Many of these have been effectively free samples to countries already considering procurement of Russian vaccines. For instance, Armenia, Belarus, Lebanon, Moldova, Nicaragua, and Vietnam all received donations while procurement or production negotiations with Russia were underway. The largest donations, such as to Uzbekistan, are not coming from the Russian government itself, but from Russian oligarchs or private companies.

In February, Israel provided 5,000 doses to the Palestinian Authority and announced it would gift "symbolic" doses to 20 countries. However, only four of these nations received vaccines before domestic lawsuits halted the campaign. These donations have been criticized as political backscratching and whether they will resume, and in what form, remains uncertain—particularly given questions over Israel's role in assisting the Palestinian Authority. Of the recipients identified by Think Global Health, four recently normalized diplomatic relations with Israel or are moving towards normalization; seven established or were considering establishing diplomatic offices in Jerusalem; and two were in talks to open embassies in Israel. The status of Jerusalem and normalization are unlikely to be the only motivations for Israeli vaccine diplomacy, however. Israel has a long history of providing development aid, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has continued efforts to strengthen foreign relations, especially in Africa and Europe.

Conclusion

Though vaccine diplomacy can help narrow the gap between vaccine-haves and have-nots, the majority of donations given thus far have fallen short. Rather than advance global equity or provide relief to those most in need, donations have cemented traditional spheres of influence. In the world of vaccine donation diplomacy, a friend in need, is a friend indeed.

EDITOR'S NOTE: The authors would like to thank Thomas J. Bollyky and Erik Fliegauf for their assistance.

 

This tracker was first published on March 25, 2021.

Samantha Kiernan is a research associate on global health, economics, and development at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).


Serena Tohme is a graduate student studying economic development and global health at Columbia University. She is the current global health studies intern at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).


Kailey Shanks is an intern for Think Global Health at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).


Basia Rosenbaum is a research associate for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Most Popular

Related

Vaccine Spheres of Influence Tracker

Tracking COVID-19 vaccine administration and access around the world

Trade in the Time of Pandemics

With borders closed and global travel constrained, trade will help us find a way out of the pandemic

Britain's Moral Bankruptcy Over COVID-19 Vaccines

Why a study set to deliberately infect people with coronavirus is unethical, unnecessary, and likely to be uninformative